215 Comments
Jan 4, 2023Liked by Josh Guetzkow

The whole "the data in VAERS is useless" is so hilarious since it is THEIR system! If it's useless, why do we have it? What are you doing to improve it? Do you believe we just shouldn't have a reporting system? What a joke.

Expand full comment
Jan 4, 2023·edited Jan 4, 2023Liked by Josh Guetzkow

What would such a report look like if information on the mRNA bioweapons were not being suppressed?

What would such a report look like if the reporting system for adverse events was widely known by the public and access to this system was made readily available instead of filled with hurdles?

What would such a report look like if doctors weren't actively gaslighting people, dismissing their claims and turning them away from reporting adverse events?

What would this report look like if ALL adverse events from these mRNA biowepaons were honestly and accurately reported?

Expand full comment

For me the fact that safety monitoring data needs to be pried loose by court order is a big enough confirmation officials have plenty to hide. We know none in power have clean hands.

No good deeds are concealed and no shortage of evidence exists that delay and denial are classic Washington method to sweep crimes under the rug and move to the next crisis.

For the balance of folks who want rational argument and substantiation with primary source data I thank my lucky stars to have the luxury of knowing where the slam dunk pros hide and stockpiling winning ammo by bookmark. Lucky us it's fantabulous, understandable analysis, you rock! <3

Expand full comment

This is awesome. Nice to know I wasn't the only one finding safety signals in VAERS.

I am writing a substack on this now. The CDC was notified of this by others, but they were gaslit.

Expand full comment
Jan 4, 2023Liked by Josh Guetzkow

Cdc has a name. Rochelle Wallensky. How has she gotten away with injuring so many people in broad daylight? Who is protecting her? Perhaps that is the person that should be held to account?

Expand full comment
Jan 4, 2023Liked by Josh Guetzkow

OMG thus is huge!!! Thank you!

Expand full comment
Jan 4, 2023·edited Jan 4, 2023Liked by Josh Guetzkow

By the way, the "Responding to Objections" section is excellent! I think it's worthy of its own article on your substack, so other covid vaccine critical readers can easily reference it as a standalone resource. Can call it "Defending VAERS" or "Stopping Misinformation Against VAERS."

Expand full comment

Huge indeed! I think it's definitely time to setup my Tableau skills and incorporate the PRR formulas so we can see the signals in real time! Moreover the over ~325K VAERS reports of UNKNOWN AGE, but age clearly documented in summary will add that much more visibility! I'm going on Crawford's RTE on this Tuesday, he has invited openvaers.info (Wayne), Jessica and Liz, Steven Rubin. Rubin has declined but happy to answer any questions. Wayne is game but attending might be difficult if it's during his normal work hours. Jess and Liz have an invite, hope they can make it. Haven't seen Liz do public stuff? I think it would be a good idea if you were at the table. You game? We could ask Mathew....

Expand full comment

Peter McCullough has speculated about military involvement in the decision-making hierarchy re Covid vaccines. My hypothesis is that both CDC and FDA were disempowered at outset of Covid. We see evidence of this in BARDA telling/asking FDA to pull authorization for hydroxychloroquine back in May 2020. We also see that Covid vaccines are classified as “medical countermeasures” for the purposes of compensation.

I would guess that CDC and FDA both muzzled due to as-yet undisclosed “state of biological war” and that US actual decision makers re Covid and vaccines have yet to step forward

Expand full comment
Jan 4, 2023Liked by Josh Guetzkow

Thank you for extending this to us with an analysis that's comprehensible.

Grateful for you!

Expand full comment

Several comments as a math-stats prof.

1) The PRR signal-detection system is absolute CRAP. Here's why. Imagine a new vaccine causes precisely 1000 times as many adverse events of every single type as all the comparable vaccines. If so, the PRR = 1 for every adverse event, because the proportion of any selected adverse event is unchanged as a fraction of the whole. Thus the signal is not triggered, suggesting everything is fine, even though it is actually 1000 times worse! The calculation should be: PRR = (rate per million doses of specific AE in the new vaccine) / (rate per million doses of same specific AE in old vaccines). The current PRR is designed to HIDE problems, not to expose them.

2) Your results on cancer AEs looked abnormally low. Now I remember why. You need to search on "neoplasm" as well as "cancer".

3) One speaks of lower and upper confidence limits, which bound a confidence interval, not lower and upper confidence intervals.

I will take a look at the data when I have a chance. Meanwhile, two observations. First, in 2021-22, the worst AEs for the COVID injections were about 30 times more common than for all vaccines combined. Second, the V-Safe monitoring system suggests that VAERS is underreported by a factor of about 17.

Expand full comment
Jan 4, 2023Liked by Josh Guetzkow

A steady stream of friends and acquaintances are having medical events, including death, in a way I think I have not seen before. Of course, I am older than I have ever been before. Only one of these people has connected it to the new injectable product. And that makes sense when I look at these tables - the effects are so disparate, most people would not connect them to the jab. Appendicitis? Tinnitus? Stomach problems? And that's without those who are saying they keep getting Covid again and again ...

And most people seem to think that if the jab is going to give them grief, it will be immediate, so as long as they do not develop an illness at once it cannot be connected. That they might have a heart attack five months down the line doesn't seem likely to them.

Oh well, one can only ask as diplomatically as possible: "When did you have your last "vaccine"? Really? And when did your problem develop?"

Expand full comment

Interesting that appendicitis is elevated in 12-17 year olds. I know a 17-year-old (he may have been 16 at the time) who recently had appendicitis. His parents are fully bought into the covid narrative and vaccinated and I assume he is as well, though don't have direct confirmation. His mother has a recent onset, painful autoimmune disease and they all got severe cases of covid.

It boils my blood that innocent gullible people swallowed this crap and are now suffering for it, misled by their doctors who are unable to even tell them the possible origins of their sudden health issues.

Expand full comment

Brilliant breakdown Josh!

Martin

Expand full comment

Great work.

Expand full comment