I remember early 2021 people were warning about syncitin, as I recall the spike has a region whose genetic signature matches a region of syncitin, thus the jab could trigger an autoimmune reaction that endangers the placenta? I could have the details all wrong, this isn't my area of expertise.
Interesting work, Mr. Guetzkow. I have a question, though, about your choice of statistical test. I don't understand why you used a chi-squared test. I would have done a Poisson test.
I just finished running Excel. Based on an expected average of 6 neonatal deaths per quarter, the result for 2021Q2 has p-value 0.000175; the result for 2021Q4 has p-value 0.0000569. Both these p-values are far smaller than yours.
Thus from my perspective, the results for those two quarters are not just mildly statistically significant; rather, they appear to be screaming outliers. The shots must stop!
If I misunderstood, please explain how you use a chi-squared test in this context. Thank you, best wishes, and chag sameach.
At the very start not even conception was recommended. Those who volunteered for the clinical trial had to sign not to concieve. FDA had discussed the possibility of transcription into fetal DNA. WHO recommended against vaccination during pregnancy.
Everything has changed three months later when 30 percent of Covid deaths were fully vaccinated and we already knew 0.2 percent of 2.4 million receivers of the 1st dose died before 2nd shot. Incredible.
I always thought medicine should be practiced on the cautious side. All has changed in the last years. The warning lights are flashing for everyone clear to see now, and still people are looking the other way 😢
How many people will they kill before admitting it's bad and pull it? That's the billion dollar (literally) question. I think they'll never admit it because then they would have to pay.
Like, do we know how large a population this data comes from? Either how many people total served by the insurance company, or how many mothers/pregnancies data was collected for?
Reminiscent of the spikes in the Scottish data. However, they have a solution, as they have just passed self-id for gender change [no medical note needed], so now men can get pregnant too.
Amazing work buddy.
I remember early 2021 people were warning about syncitin, as I recall the spike has a region whose genetic signature matches a region of syncitin, thus the jab could trigger an autoimmune reaction that endangers the placenta? I could have the details all wrong, this isn't my area of expertise.
Interesting work, Mr. Guetzkow. I have a question, though, about your choice of statistical test. I don't understand why you used a chi-squared test. I would have done a Poisson test.
I just finished running Excel. Based on an expected average of 6 neonatal deaths per quarter, the result for 2021Q2 has p-value 0.000175; the result for 2021Q4 has p-value 0.0000569. Both these p-values are far smaller than yours.
Thus from my perspective, the results for those two quarters are not just mildly statistically significant; rather, they appear to be screaming outliers. The shots must stop!
If I misunderstood, please explain how you use a chi-squared test in this context. Thank you, best wishes, and chag sameach.
Thank You very much!!!
At the very start not even conception was recommended. Those who volunteered for the clinical trial had to sign not to concieve. FDA had discussed the possibility of transcription into fetal DNA. WHO recommended against vaccination during pregnancy.
Everything has changed three months later when 30 percent of Covid deaths were fully vaccinated and we already knew 0.2 percent of 2.4 million receivers of the 1st dose died before 2nd shot. Incredible.
https://shlomokafka.substack.com/p/birth-rates-in-israel?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
This is even more shocking when you consider the likely decline in birth rates.
Incomprehensible
well the dumb shits wouldn't listen to Noah either
Same picture in Scotland!
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wj4rE0LrpR0
Just here are the spikes in September and March.
I always thought medicine should be practiced on the cautious side. All has changed in the last years. The warning lights are flashing for everyone clear to see now, and still people are looking the other way 😢
How many people will they kill before admitting it's bad and pull it? That's the billion dollar (literally) question. I think they'll never admit it because then they would have to pay.
It’s bad enough that people cannot conceive, but this is downright murder of live babies.
What's the denominator?
Like, do we know how large a population this data comes from? Either how many people total served by the insurance company, or how many mothers/pregnancies data was collected for?
Reminiscent of the spikes in the Scottish data. However, they have a solution, as they have just passed self-id for gender change [no medical note needed], so now men can get pregnant too.
Thanks so much for adding the other numbers-- that's extremely helpful!