Well, they always tell us we should not worry about giving up our privacy to the government, as if we have done nothing wrong, we have nothing to hide so there is no reason to be worried. So conversely, if they are keeping this info of public interest private, then they do have something to hide, or maybe have nothing to hide because they haven't done these studies...
Sep 14, 2022·edited Sep 14, 2022Liked by Josh Guetzkow
Thank you so much Josh for sharing this important information about the FDA's purposeful obfuscation. Not surprisingly, it appears they have something to hide.
Clearly they are hiding important information …I am not surprised… I too am sick to my stomach! Waisting our tax dollars on this criminal health agency is one thing but hiding information that could help individuals be alerted to these harmful experimental injections is diabolical.
We need Divine intervention…
We need to be proactive…
We need to pray for guidance…
Thank you for this information and hopefully some organization will sue. ICAN - The Highwire.com -Del Bigtree or Childrens health defense- Robert Kennedy Jr. perhaps .
They have had excellent outcomes in their litigations… we cannot give up the fight!
Supporting them will help obtain information and save lives!
Can we compile a list of FDA's approving and promoting dangerous products before and beyond Covid? Please send in any that you know of
Here are 2
FDA also approved Oxycontin with knowledge of its risks, using fraudulent science and fake graphs. See the excellent Hulu series "Dopesick"
and their acceptable levels of Cesium - 137 in food is over 60 times higher than the International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War. IPPNW's limit for Cesium 137 in food is 19 Bq/kg. For Belarus and Russia, it is under 40. For Japan under 100. For the European Union under 600. For the FDA, 1200 is OK.
The HHS, and the FDA and duh CDC are NOT united States, agencies and are "Non-Positive law NGOs, whom are criminals, acting like they have any authority what-so-never to do all that they have done, and are going to do unless STOPPED!
FACT: Title 42 U.S.C is where the "poke-um" gang pretends to have any legal authority to do anything that they do, do!
COPIED AND PASTED, under Title 17 Sec. 107 for education and criminal charges...
"Positive Law Titles vs. Non-Positive Law Titles
The Code is divided into titles according to subject matter. Some are called positive law titles and the rest are called non-positive law titles.
A positive law title of the Code is itself a Federal statute. A non-positive law title of the Code is an editorial compilation of Federal statutes. For example, Title 10, Armed Forces, is a positive law title because the title itself has been enacted by Congress. For the enacting provision of Title 10, see first section of the Act of August 10, 1956, ch. 1041 (70A Stat. 1).
By contrast, Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, is a non-positive law title. Title 42 is comprised of many individually enacted Federal statutes––such as the Public Health Service Act and the Social Security Act––that have been editorially compiled and organized into the title,
but the title itself has not been enacted.
The distinction is legally significant. Non-positive law titles are prima facie evidence of the law, but positive law titles constitute legal evidence of the law in all Federal and State courts (1 U.S.C. 204).
Having, on one hand, non-positive law titles as prima facie evidence of the law, and on the other hand, positive law titles as legal evidence of the law, means that both types of titles contain statutory text that can be presented to a Federal or State court as evidence of the wording of the law. The difference between "prima facie" and "legal" is a matter of authoritativeness."
So if anyone can READ, and understand what they READ, than they'd SEE that Title 42 USC the home of the HHS, FDA, and CDC IS NOT POSITIVE LAW, and affords NO ONE PROTECTION from "GENOCIDE" charges!
It appears they have something to hide. Strange how the Food and Drug Administration feels they have some right to hide information that is critical to our health. If they won't tell us information critical to our health then why should we trust them?
The POSITIVE law, or LAWFUL agencies are marked with an asterisk!
The NON positive law, NGOs do NOT have any asterisk, next their corresponding number!
The Term "Positive Law"
A positive law title of the Code is itself a Federal statute. A non-positive law title of the Code is an editorial compilation of Federal statutes. For example, Title 10, Armed Forces, is a positive law title because the title itself has been enacted by Congress. For the enacting provision of Title 10, see first section of the Act of August 10, 1956, ch. 1041 (70A Stat. 1). By contrast, Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, is a non-positive law title. Title 42 is comprised of many individually enacted Federal statutes––such as the Public Health Service Act and the Social Security Act––that have been editorially compiled and organized into the title, but the title itself has not been enacted.
FYI. The CDC was engaging in similar behavior as far back as 1996 with regard to Merck's chickenpox vaccine. Gary Goldman describes their misbehavior in this interview from 2022.
Miller, N. Z. (2022). "Interview with Gary Goldman, PhD." Foundation for Educational Research.
Well, they always tell us we should not worry about giving up our privacy to the government, as if we have done nothing wrong, we have nothing to hide so there is no reason to be worried. So conversely, if they are keeping this info of public interest private, then they do have something to hide, or maybe have nothing to hide because they haven't done these studies...
Thank you so much Josh for sharing this important information about the FDA's purposeful obfuscation. Not surprisingly, it appears they have something to hide.
Great summary, thank you. Getting increasingly anxious as bad news continues to pile up and we inch closer to the tipping point of information.
Nobody asked for interagency ccommunications. They asked for the info. The fact that FDA and CDC discussed it does not exempt it from release.
Must be dreadful.
FDA new HIDE and SEEK game… change rules and definitions!
Clearly they are hiding important information …I am not surprised… I too am sick to my stomach! Waisting our tax dollars on this criminal health agency is one thing but hiding information that could help individuals be alerted to these harmful experimental injections is diabolical.
We need Divine intervention…
We need to be proactive…
We need to pray for guidance…
Thank you for this information and hopefully some organization will sue. ICAN - The Highwire.com -Del Bigtree or Childrens health defense- Robert Kennedy Jr. perhaps .
They have had excellent outcomes in their litigations… we cannot give up the fight!
Supporting them will help obtain information and save lives!
These institutions keep forgetting - they serve US.
Can we compile a list of FDA's approving and promoting dangerous products before and beyond Covid? Please send in any that you know of
Here are 2
FDA also approved Oxycontin with knowledge of its risks, using fraudulent science and fake graphs. See the excellent Hulu series "Dopesick"
and their acceptable levels of Cesium - 137 in food is over 60 times higher than the International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War. IPPNW's limit for Cesium 137 in food is 19 Bq/kg. For Belarus and Russia, it is under 40. For Japan under 100. For the European Union under 600. For the FDA, 1200 is OK.
https://coronawise.substack.com/p/for-those-who-still-trust-the-fda
For Those Who Still Trust the FDA. Radioactive Cesium – 137 Limits in Food by Country
Time to sue them then.
Biden says recession is no longer a recession:
https://heartlanddailynews.com/2022/08/biden-redefines-recession-and-fact-checkers-follow-reason/
https://babylonbee.com/news/democrats-propose-another-inflation-reduction-act-to-combat-inflation-from-the-first-inflation-reduction-act
2+2=5 or whatever reflects one's 'lived experience'; willy owners are now female and
The basic function of the Freedom of Information Act is to ensure informed citizens, vital to the functioning of a democratic society.
Until they say it isn't.
Welcome to the New Normal.
The HHS, and the FDA and duh CDC are NOT united States, agencies and are "Non-Positive law NGOs, whom are criminals, acting like they have any authority what-so-never to do all that they have done, and are going to do unless STOPPED!
FACT: Title 42 U.S.C is where the "poke-um" gang pretends to have any legal authority to do anything that they do, do!
COPIED AND PASTED, under Title 17 Sec. 107 for education and criminal charges...
"Positive Law Titles vs. Non-Positive Law Titles
The Code is divided into titles according to subject matter. Some are called positive law titles and the rest are called non-positive law titles.
A positive law title of the Code is itself a Federal statute. A non-positive law title of the Code is an editorial compilation of Federal statutes. For example, Title 10, Armed Forces, is a positive law title because the title itself has been enacted by Congress. For the enacting provision of Title 10, see first section of the Act of August 10, 1956, ch. 1041 (70A Stat. 1).
By contrast, Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, is a non-positive law title. Title 42 is comprised of many individually enacted Federal statutes––such as the Public Health Service Act and the Social Security Act––that have been editorially compiled and organized into the title,
but the title itself has not been enacted.
The distinction is legally significant. Non-positive law titles are prima facie evidence of the law, but positive law titles constitute legal evidence of the law in all Federal and State courts (1 U.S.C. 204).
Having, on one hand, non-positive law titles as prima facie evidence of the law, and on the other hand, positive law titles as legal evidence of the law, means that both types of titles contain statutory text that can be presented to a Federal or State court as evidence of the wording of the law. The difference between "prima facie" and "legal" is a matter of authoritativeness."
So if anyone can READ, and understand what they READ, than they'd SEE that Title 42 USC the home of the HHS, FDA, and CDC IS NOT POSITIVE LAW, and affords NO ONE PROTECTION from "GENOCIDE" charges!
It appears they have something to hide. Strange how the Food and Drug Administration feels they have some right to hide information that is critical to our health. If they won't tell us information critical to our health then why should we trust them?
Again the HHS, FDA, and CDC is NOT a positive law agency, which means they are NGO, subcontractor agents of the FEDERAL Government!
The POSITIVE Law agencies and NON positive agencies are FOUND at...
https://uscode.house.gov/browse.xhtml
The POSITIVE law, or LAWFUL agencies are marked with an asterisk!
The NON positive law, NGOs do NOT have any asterisk, next their corresponding number!
The Term "Positive Law"
A positive law title of the Code is itself a Federal statute. A non-positive law title of the Code is an editorial compilation of Federal statutes. For example, Title 10, Armed Forces, is a positive law title because the title itself has been enacted by Congress. For the enacting provision of Title 10, see first section of the Act of August 10, 1956, ch. 1041 (70A Stat. 1). By contrast, Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, is a non-positive law title. Title 42 is comprised of many individually enacted Federal statutes––such as the Public Health Service Act and the Social Security Act––that have been editorially compiled and organized into the title, but the title itself has not been enacted.
The HHS, FDA and CDC are all "THE VIRUS!" And co-conspirators of the GENOCIDE!"
Wow. 😑
FYI. The CDC was engaging in similar behavior as far back as 1996 with regard to Merck's chickenpox vaccine. Gary Goldman describes their misbehavior in this interview from 2022.
Miller, N. Z. (2022). "Interview with Gary Goldman, PhD." Foundation for Educational Research.
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Neil-Miller-7/publication/359051450_Interview_with_Gary_Goldman_PhD_on_CDC_suppression_of_undesirable_vaccine_data/links/6224f1da97401151d201d182/Interview-with-Gary-Goldman-PhD-on-CDC-suppression-of-undesirable-vaccine-data.pdf