I don't even know if they tracked AE's and deaths that long after vaccination.... there is something about it in the trial protocol but I don't remember off the top of my head.

Expand full comment

Right. Thank you for explaining.

You might be interested to know that the Australian Health Minister outright called the rollout “the largest global vaccination trial ever.” Sounds about right.


Expand full comment

Great work exposing the frauds of the trial. I've been pondering how removing the liability shield from these jabs is going to have to revisit those trials. I think back to the Vioxx settlement and note how they caught them because of the trial data which showed elevated heart risks. The Pfizer jab trial did everything to hide bad data on adverse events but if they had even a rate of severe adverse events of 1 in 1000, when you extrapolate that out to the billions of doses given out, it would mean they knew there would be harms associated with hundreds o thousands of people. I wonder how those trial participants are doing now?

Expand full comment

97 days. Oh no!

Does this mean they did not see the peak in deaths 5 months after the jabs?

Shocking I say, shocking.

Expand full comment

Great detective work, thank you.

Expand full comment
Nov 15, 2022Liked by Josh Guetzkow

So 3 months.... Didn't I read somewhere that people die around 5 months after, if they get past the first 2 weeks?

Expand full comment

Excellent piece of work👌

Obviously, a terrible Pfizer-style science exposed. Again.

Expand full comment

We’re there any people in that study who chose to remain unvaccinated after the unblinding? Do we know that number? Anyone tracking them?

Expand full comment

Hi Josh,

Which phase was the unblinding done in? The way I'm reading the above, it was done in the stacked 2/3 phase?

And what implications does this have for Phase 3, which is still in progress?

Expand full comment
Jan 6Liked by Josh Guetzkow

If they have unblinded, and then eliminated their control group, doesn't that technically negate the entire trial???

Who does science like this????

Expand full comment
Dec 18, 2022Liked by Josh Guetzkow

Hi thank you, what program do you need to open the pfizer documents please from the first link?

Expand full comment

Seems appropriate to drop this here. FYI, I'll never charge to sub to my stack, this info needs to be spread wide:

Covid 19 vaccine damage repair protocols:


The jab probably potentiates cancer, so:

Vitamin D for cancer:


Microphage treatment for cancer:


Expand full comment

"In the Phase 2/3 portion of Study 2, based on data accrued through November 14, 2020, approximately

44,000 participants 12 years of age and older were randomized equally and received 2 doses of

Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine (30 mcg modRNA) or placebo separated by 21 days. Participants are

planned to be followed for up to 24 months, for assessments of safety and efficacy against COVID-19."


Expand full comment

Still unclear to me, what was the trigger in December 2020 for the unblinding? As soon as we get to xx people with Covid symptoms and positive PCR test we unblind and see how we did? Was that number xx stated in advance? O/w don't you have to explain to the FDA why you want to unblind?

"unblind, but we haven't even got to 200 yet"

"well, you see.....after two months ....waning..."

"oh. well go ahead then"

Expand full comment

That Pfizer unblinded over 55s more quickly than the up to 55s may not be that significant - but only because over 55s were under-represented. The company excluded so many morbidities from the vaccine group that the death rate was a sixth that of the normal population.

Expand full comment

Fantastic summary! Thank you!

Expand full comment