"nothing to do with the “investigational product”"
Very common dismissal.
Billions and decades of research later, doctors don't know the cause of autism, allergies, asthma, autoimmunity but they magically know trial adverse events are not related to this new mRNA vaccine?
That Argentinian trial site keeps coming up.The first mystery was how they managed to get so many participants enrolled in such a short time. And now this. And you make an important point about these sub contractor sites wanting a positive outcome in order to get more work in the future. Surely Ventavia wanted the same. It would be so interesting to know the real AE numbers.
As a former CRA and clinical coordinator, I can tell you that this is an absurdly dirty business where every kind of corruption is inevitable and facilitated. CROs know their job is not to run a clean trial, but to get favorable results for the investigational product and to make it seem like there was a clean trial.
Every team has "cleaners" to tidy up little problems like this and to assess whether or not it's likely to ever be found out. They assumed there would be no digging into the database or that they could stop it from happening. In my experience, clinical trials, the FDA, and even NIH studies are completely unreliable. I've seen all data that undermined the desired outcome "cleaned" away and I have heard all manner of misconduct, one prominent researcher simply reversing all of the "no" answers.
Clinical trials and NIH studies are mostly high end public relations features.
An attempt to track down the 302/354 people in the vaccine arm that were removed or withdrew from the 1231 site seems like a good start. So Josh, does the recent Pfizer FOIA release specify the reasons for these 302? Or 354 if the files do not specify which arm of the trial they were in. All it took was hiding three heart attacks in Merck’s Vioxx trial to secure approval, leading to >50,000 dead in America alone. The precedent for Trial Fraud and regulatory capture/disinterest is well established in the courts
Josh, thank you for shining more light on this! I have come to know Augusto as well and can’t think of a better person to be called to testify in the Fraud of the Century. He needs a law firm that will represent him, and we all need to share this story!!! (The Brook Jackson lawsuit had a bizarre setback this week now that we know Pfizer didn’t need to follow ANY basic trial site protocols; as their contract was for a ‘prototype’ with the DoD😡. But fraud is not a protocol deviation….it’s simply fraud)
May 23, 2022·edited May 23, 2022Liked by Josh Guetzkow
i am so angry i actually accepted the two Pfizer vaccines. took me a while, but was visiting my family in California from Europe and everyone was so omg covid, nobody can meet until we're all vaccinated!! spent a week in a hotel in 2019 before anyone would see us and spent hundreds of dollars on tests. luckily my 12 & 15-year-old kids have managed to travel and live pretty normal lives with ZERO covid "vaccines". thank God.
Excellent write up. I will be checking against the data I have. We wrote Abstractor (https://vaccines.shinyapps.io/abstractor/) to search all the pdfs initially, but have plans are to extend it to be a front end onto the SaS (clinical trial) database. We've made good progress so far behind the scenes on this and I was eyeballing site #1231 last night.
So, are these the ”suspected but not confirmed” covid cases that were reported in Pfizer’s trial, which I found strange especially due to their large number?
(in ref to the following quote)
”And that’s how Pfizer made cases of myocarditis and pericarditis disappear, by sweeping them under the rug of COVID-19. Moreover, the diagnosis of COVID-19 would not count against the efficacy calculations, since those required a positive PCR test to confirm diagnosis.”
"nothing to do with the “investigational product”"
Very common dismissal.
Billions and decades of research later, doctors don't know the cause of autism, allergies, asthma, autoimmunity but they magically know trial adverse events are not related to this new mRNA vaccine?
https://vinuarumugham.substack.com/p/billions-and-decades-of-research?s=w
That Argentinian trial site keeps coming up.The first mystery was how they managed to get so many participants enrolled in such a short time. And now this. And you make an important point about these sub contractor sites wanting a positive outcome in order to get more work in the future. Surely Ventavia wanted the same. It would be so interesting to know the real AE numbers.
As a former CRA and clinical coordinator, I can tell you that this is an absurdly dirty business where every kind of corruption is inevitable and facilitated. CROs know their job is not to run a clean trial, but to get favorable results for the investigational product and to make it seem like there was a clean trial.
Every team has "cleaners" to tidy up little problems like this and to assess whether or not it's likely to ever be found out. They assumed there would be no digging into the database or that they could stop it from happening. In my experience, clinical trials, the FDA, and even NIH studies are completely unreliable. I've seen all data that undermined the desired outcome "cleaned" away and I have heard all manner of misconduct, one prominent researcher simply reversing all of the "no" answers.
Clinical trials and NIH studies are mostly high end public relations features.
An attempt to track down the 302/354 people in the vaccine arm that were removed or withdrew from the 1231 site seems like a good start. So Josh, does the recent Pfizer FOIA release specify the reasons for these 302? Or 354 if the files do not specify which arm of the trial they were in. All it took was hiding three heart attacks in Merck’s Vioxx trial to secure approval, leading to >50,000 dead in America alone. The precedent for Trial Fraud and regulatory capture/disinterest is well established in the courts
Good stuff. Thanks for all your hard work that benefits all of us!
Josh, thank you for shining more light on this! I have come to know Augusto as well and can’t think of a better person to be called to testify in the Fraud of the Century. He needs a law firm that will represent him, and we all need to share this story!!! (The Brook Jackson lawsuit had a bizarre setback this week now that we know Pfizer didn’t need to follow ANY basic trial site protocols; as their contract was for a ‘prototype’ with the DoD😡. But fraud is not a protocol deviation….it’s simply fraud)
i am so angry i actually accepted the two Pfizer vaccines. took me a while, but was visiting my family in California from Europe and everyone was so omg covid, nobody can meet until we're all vaccinated!! spent a week in a hotel in 2019 before anyone would see us and spent hundreds of dollars on tests. luckily my 12 & 15-year-old kids have managed to travel and live pretty normal lives with ZERO covid "vaccines". thank God.
Thanks for covering this. This is sickening fraud. The people need to demand justice.
Brilliant work here!!! 🙌
Excellent write up. I will be checking against the data I have. We wrote Abstractor (https://vaccines.shinyapps.io/abstractor/) to search all the pdfs initially, but have plans are to extend it to be a front end onto the SaS (clinical trial) database. We've made good progress so far behind the scenes on this and I was eyeballing site #1231 last night.
So, are these the ”suspected but not confirmed” covid cases that were reported in Pfizer’s trial, which I found strange especially due to their large number?
(in ref to the following quote)
”And that’s how Pfizer made cases of myocarditis and pericarditis disappear, by sweeping them under the rug of COVID-19. Moreover, the diagnosis of COVID-19 would not count against the efficacy calculations, since those required a positive PCR test to confirm diagnosis.”
F R A U D - money speaks. Thanks to Dr Guetzkow .
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/no-10-policy-chiefs-blissful-ignorance-over-vaccine-victims/
Here in blighty, heads-in-sand syndrome prevails amongst our leaders, despite Sir Christopher Chope's courageous efforts.
https://ibloga.blogspot.com/2022/05/mark-steyn-interviews-vaccine-injury.html
Finally, Mark Steyn -all hail to him-interviews a lady damaged by the AstraZeneca vaccine; she is young and her life is more or less on hold.
However, our MSM is now enthralled by monkey pox and the deliriously exciting prospects of a possible poc jabbathon.
"We know that Fernando did not visit the trial site on Sept. 12" Small point but don't you mean Augusto?
His blinding was compromised on October 9, 2020, as stated correctly elsewhere in the piece, not on Sept. 10 as stated near the end.
Boom.
Wow