This is wonderful evidence, what slacker dirtbags these "watch dogs" are. Tar and feather is my first vote but this is a powerful contender, go you!! FOIA requests are my absolute favorites because it's always a goodie bag of waste, fraud and abuse of power that thrives in the darkness of the Federal bureaucracy. Big time kudos & thanks let's see FOIA fires shining light all over the swamp creatures!!
These finding corroborate that CDC is not a public health agency.
CDC is one of the core agencies within HHS running the US Government’s domestic bioterrorism program to maim and kill as many Americans as possible with impunity.
COVID-19 is NOT a government-run public health program.
It's also NOT a public health program that's fallen under regulatory capture by profiteering pharmaceutical corporations.
HHS (FDA, CDC, NIH, NIAID), Dept. of Defense, Dept. Homeland Security, Dept of Justice are all involved in the bioterrorism program. It’s funded by taxpayers, authorized by Congress and US presidents.
There’s lots of medical evidence supporting this conclusion, from doctors treating patients, censorship, treatment suppression. There’s lots of scientific evidence from people digging up past published research and patents of Fauci, Baric, Daszak, Shi, etc. There’s lots of data from databases like VAERS, DMED, from the Pfizer documents released through the PHMPT FOIA case, and from millions of peoples’ personal observations of their own experiences, and family and friends’ experiences, about severe adverse effects and deaths.
I've been compiling the LEGAL evidence - statutes, regulations, executive orders, declarations, court cases, FDA guidance documents.
In 1997, Congress passed two laws within three days of each other.
Nov. 18 - National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), adding protections to the rights of military personnel to refuse participation in chemical and biological weapons experiments (response to public outrage about injuries and deaths of military personnel forced to take ANTHRAX vaccines during and after 1991 Gulf War)
Nov. 21 - FDA Modernization Act - Amendment to Food Drug and Cosmetics Act to create the EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION program and establish the entire American population as pool of human subjects for experimental use of chemical and biological weapons under "public health emergency" declarations by HHS Secretary, which automatically revoked informed consent rights.
EFFECT: Transferred operations and funding for the US Chemical and Biological Warfare Program from 50 USC Chapter 32 (the Department of Defense) to 21 USC Chapter 9 (The Food and Drug Administration of the Dept. of Health and Human Services), and expanded it.
In 2004, Congress nullified informed consent principles through the EUA program, when they passed Project Bioshield Act.
See 21 USC 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii) waiving informed consent for unapproved products (2004); 21 USC 360bbb-3(e)(2)(A) waiving informed consent for unapproved use of an approved product (2004).
The statutes include language that HHS Secretary may set conditions on EUAs that recipients be informed “of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, [and] of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product,” which appears to protect a meaningful option to refuse, thus upholding the principle of informed consent as framed by the Nuremberg Code.
However, the Department of Justice and at least one federal judge have interpreted the “consequences of refusal” to mean that recipients may be told by the person demanding that they accept the product, that if they refuse, they will be disciplined, fired or lose their place at school, thus legalizing coercive medical treatment in violation of the Nuremberg Code.
US government also voided “Good Clinical Practices” laws — the contracts for the kill-shots are military prototype contracts for “large scale vaccine manufacturing demonstrations” run through DOD/BARDA:
Congress also authorized use of ‘real world evidence’ in FDA regulatory procedures, meaning distributing experimental products to public at large first, without prior valid clinical data on safety and efficacy, and collecting data about effects afterward, through private databases and health registries.
Where's the congressional oversight?! I'm not optimistic that a change of parties would change that, either. Major players in both parties are bought and paid for.
The Australian TGA (Therapeutic Goods Administration) are equally lax when it comes to monitoring safety of the COVID-19 vaccines. They release public 'reports' online, but only acknowledge a minute fraction of reported adverse events as being caused by the vaccine. Add in thousands of healthcare workers who are afraid to report adverse events they encounter due to threats of reprimand from their regulator (AHPRA), and you have a gross undercount of the true rate of COVID-19 vaccine-induced adverse events. I can appreciate that some events will be genuinely coincidental, but there is no doubt in my mind that the TGA are willfully ignoring vaccine-induced morbidity and mortality. It is impossible to believe this is solely due to incompetence; therefore, on some level, it must be deliberate.
Thank you sir for your diligence and for staying on top of this! This was great research work. You really knew how to go about it in such a way that yielded lots of answers, sadly they are not the answers that should be coming from a proper medical study but I am so thankful you are exposing them. God bless you
Geez. Every time I figure the FOSness of the CDC has bottomed out, they plumb to new depths. I think back to a time when I posted some (I thought) disturbing data from VAERS, and one of my followers said something along the lines, "...well, there are a lot of false records in VAERS." Or words to that effect. Now we see that the CDC did not even CONSULT VAERS. Then again, why would they? One of their chief funders--Pfizer--was busy lying to the FDA, spending all that loot from the various state governments and laughing all the way to the bank. Nice work if you can get it!
How could anyone be following this and not be indignantly and overwhelmingly nauseous? What these government actors have been doing is a grotesque charade of regulatory oversight.
It seems a comment was deleted here that I just found in my inbox. It was from Jordan and read: " A friend of mine, a CDC apologist, points out that the briefing doc is listed as a "draft" for "internal use" which is "subject to change without notice". Since it's just a draft, he maintains, the CDC was not lying when it conceded it did no PRRs. Do you see any credence in this line of defense?"
My reply is that they revised the document in Feb 2022. It is also written that it is subject to change without notice, but they say that they are still going to calculate PRRs. So apparently they didn't change that plan in the preceding year:
Thank you Dr Guetzkow and I hope that this will aid our own Sir Christopher Chope, in his campaign for the many victims of vaccine injury here in the UK.
To date, his efforts have met with official evasions.
That is the reason why they did not follow up on a complaint that I made from Buenos Aires in the Pfizer clinical trial and they never followed up... a shame
I've just received yesterday a FOIA response following a request I submitted to the CDC a few months ago. In an email dated on 19 october 2021 from Martha Sharan to John Su / Tom Shimabukuro, she states that she just explained to a journalist that the CDC doesn't use PPR (there is a typo, it's PRR)
BRILLIANT!!!!!!!! Going right into my latest substack. THANK YOU.
Well done! 🙌
This is wonderful evidence, what slacker dirtbags these "watch dogs" are. Tar and feather is my first vote but this is a powerful contender, go you!! FOIA requests are my absolute favorites because it's always a goodie bag of waste, fraud and abuse of power that thrives in the darkness of the Federal bureaucracy. Big time kudos & thanks let's see FOIA fires shining light all over the swamp creatures!!
I guess I should be shocked but just more business as usual. Only when people start going to jail will things change.
These finding corroborate that CDC is not a public health agency.
CDC is one of the core agencies within HHS running the US Government’s domestic bioterrorism program to maim and kill as many Americans as possible with impunity.
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/american-domestic-bioterrorism-program
COVID-19 is NOT a government-run public health program.
It's also NOT a public health program that's fallen under regulatory capture by profiteering pharmaceutical corporations.
HHS (FDA, CDC, NIH, NIAID), Dept. of Defense, Dept. Homeland Security, Dept of Justice are all involved in the bioterrorism program. It’s funded by taxpayers, authorized by Congress and US presidents.
There’s lots of medical evidence supporting this conclusion, from doctors treating patients, censorship, treatment suppression. There’s lots of scientific evidence from people digging up past published research and patents of Fauci, Baric, Daszak, Shi, etc. There’s lots of data from databases like VAERS, DMED, from the Pfizer documents released through the PHMPT FOIA case, and from millions of peoples’ personal observations of their own experiences, and family and friends’ experiences, about severe adverse effects and deaths.
I've been compiling the LEGAL evidence - statutes, regulations, executive orders, declarations, court cases, FDA guidance documents.
In 1997, Congress passed two laws within three days of each other.
Nov. 18 - National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), adding protections to the rights of military personnel to refuse participation in chemical and biological weapons experiments (response to public outrage about injuries and deaths of military personnel forced to take ANTHRAX vaccines during and after 1991 Gulf War)
Nov. 21 - FDA Modernization Act - Amendment to Food Drug and Cosmetics Act to create the EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION program and establish the entire American population as pool of human subjects for experimental use of chemical and biological weapons under "public health emergency" declarations by HHS Secretary, which automatically revoked informed consent rights.
EFFECT: Transferred operations and funding for the US Chemical and Biological Warfare Program from 50 USC Chapter 32 (the Department of Defense) to 21 USC Chapter 9 (The Food and Drug Administration of the Dept. of Health and Human Services), and expanded it.
In 2004, Congress nullified informed consent principles through the EUA program, when they passed Project Bioshield Act.
See 21 USC 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii) waiving informed consent for unapproved products (2004); 21 USC 360bbb-3(e)(2)(A) waiving informed consent for unapproved use of an approved product (2004).
The statutes include language that HHS Secretary may set conditions on EUAs that recipients be informed “of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, [and] of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product,” which appears to protect a meaningful option to refuse, thus upholding the principle of informed consent as framed by the Nuremberg Code.
However, the Department of Justice and at least one federal judge have interpreted the “consequences of refusal” to mean that recipients may be told by the person demanding that they accept the product, that if they refuse, they will be disciplined, fired or lose their place at school, thus legalizing coercive medical treatment in violation of the Nuremberg Code.
US government also voided “Good Clinical Practices” laws — the contracts for the kill-shots are military prototype contracts for “large scale vaccine manufacturing demonstrations” run through DOD/BARDA:
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/implications-of-10-usc-2371b-the
Congress also authorized use of ‘real world evidence’ in FDA regulatory procedures, meaning distributing experimental products to public at large first, without prior valid clinical data on safety and efficacy, and collecting data about effects afterward, through private databases and health registries.
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/faked-clinical-trials-and-real-world
Where's the congressional oversight?! I'm not optimistic that a change of parties would change that, either. Major players in both parties are bought and paid for.
The Australian TGA (Therapeutic Goods Administration) are equally lax when it comes to monitoring safety of the COVID-19 vaccines. They release public 'reports' online, but only acknowledge a minute fraction of reported adverse events as being caused by the vaccine. Add in thousands of healthcare workers who are afraid to report adverse events they encounter due to threats of reprimand from their regulator (AHPRA), and you have a gross undercount of the true rate of COVID-19 vaccine-induced adverse events. I can appreciate that some events will be genuinely coincidental, but there is no doubt in my mind that the TGA are willfully ignoring vaccine-induced morbidity and mortality. It is impossible to believe this is solely due to incompetence; therefore, on some level, it must be deliberate.
Thank you sir for your diligence and for staying on top of this! This was great research work. You really knew how to go about it in such a way that yielded lots of answers, sadly they are not the answers that should be coming from a proper medical study but I am so thankful you are exposing them. God bless you
Shouldn't the CDC admitting that the entire surveillance scheme was complete fiction be a much bigger bombshell??!!! Amazing how far we have fallen...
Geez. Every time I figure the FOSness of the CDC has bottomed out, they plumb to new depths. I think back to a time when I posted some (I thought) disturbing data from VAERS, and one of my followers said something along the lines, "...well, there are a lot of false records in VAERS." Or words to that effect. Now we see that the CDC did not even CONSULT VAERS. Then again, why would they? One of their chief funders--Pfizer--was busy lying to the FDA, spending all that loot from the various state governments and laughing all the way to the bank. Nice work if you can get it!
How could anyone be following this and not be indignantly and overwhelmingly nauseous? What these government actors have been doing is a grotesque charade of regulatory oversight.
It seems a comment was deleted here that I just found in my inbox. It was from Jordan and read: " A friend of mine, a CDC apologist, points out that the briefing doc is listed as a "draft" for "internal use" which is "subject to change without notice". Since it's just a draft, he maintains, the CDC was not lying when it conceded it did no PRRs. Do you see any credence in this line of defense?"
My reply is that they revised the document in Feb 2022. It is also written that it is subject to change without notice, but they say that they are still going to calculate PRRs. So apparently they didn't change that plan in the preceding year:
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/pdf/VAERS-COVID19-SOP-02-02-2022-508.pdf
Furthermore, the Epoch Times recently received a response from John Wu at the CDC stating that they have been conducting PRR's since Feb, 2021: https://www.theepochtimes.com/exclusive-cdc-says-it-performed-vaccine-safety-data-mining-after-saying-it-didnt_4617563.html
Good sleuthing, Jack!
Thank you Dr Guetzkow and I hope that this will aid our own Sir Christopher Chope, in his campaign for the many victims of vaccine injury here in the UK.
To date, his efforts have met with official evasions.
That is the reason why they did not follow up on a complaint that I made from Buenos Aires in the Pfizer clinical trial and they never followed up... a shame
Hi.
I've just received yesterday a FOIA response following a request I submitted to the CDC a few months ago. In an email dated on 19 october 2021 from Martha Sharan to John Su / Tom Shimabukuro, she states that she just explained to a journalist that the CDC doesn't use PPR (there is a typo, it's PRR)