Given the media suppression, the denialism within the majority public, I'm starting to think that even if we carrier pigeons, semaphore or Morse coded this info to everyone, they would still be pushing everyone to be innocculated.
Is it me or have we transitioned to living in the movie "Idiocracy"?!🤔🤨😐🤦♀️
The "math/stats" of the Protocol Violations table actually works out worse than reported though (you went easy on Pfizer). Good tests for rare events are Poisson and Exact Binomials.
Because the sample sizes were essentially identical (21,825 +/- 3), you can get a quick view of the probability of obtaining the other sample based on the parameters of the first, using the Poisson distribution.
The probability of observing 61 or less successes in an interval of ~22,000 people -- when the Poisson mean is 311 successes (per ~22,000) -- is tiny:
2.4 * 10^-67
It is much, much less likely than even 1 in 999 trillion.
The binominal probability of 61 or less out of 21828, using the probability of (311/21,823=) 0.014251 -- is even lower still:
They could have wrapped some colored tape around the vials so that no one could see inside to know what they got. It would have been an easy fix. Thanks for reporting on this Josh.
Excellent. Open Edward Dowd link to his twitter and scroll down thru tweets. Their is and excellent Zoom link to watch and listen to Dr. Peirre Kory, Dr Jessica Rose, Edward Dowd, the lead systems analist from the PANDA group out of S. Africa, a GP Dr. from Ireland, and the host. 1 hr 38 minutes. Excellent. Thanks Josh.
From the article: <<Why does that matter? Recall that there was a much higher rate of “protocol deviations” among the placebo group than the treatment group (331 in treatment vs. 61 in placebo):>>
Don't you mean a much lower rate of deviations among the placebo group?
Great article, but please fix this - it's an important point and is confusing.
Fraud: deception or misrepresentation to gain an advantage: many of us who have resisted the propaganda from the outset, believe that other dodgy arrangements will eventually. come to light: unusual PPE contracts awarded, vested interests, cronyism,suppression of inconveniently challenging findings: the lab leak saga comes to mind.
Can't prove it, but knew there was fraud from the get-go. Billions at stake, a psychopathic corporation, a rushed trial, claims of too high efficacy. Important context is the fact that this fraud is the norm in vax trials. Real world data that is covered up anyhow, shows failures with pertussis, measles, chickenpox, mumps, and flu vaccines. And not only. Double blinded vax trials with inert placebo, independent of Big Pharma and Pharma interference (which means captured health agencies and they are all captured), are not done. Ever. They can't be. Only way is independent university, research institute trials. Key word there being independent, that is of both Pharma funding (direct, indirect), and a vax zealotry. So forget about it.
Tracking down and documenting the 311 vaccine arm withdraws is a small sample set of potentially significant importance. 6x the rate of the placebo arm? Really? The Augusto Roux story out of the sketchy site 1231/4444 in Buenos Aires is just one of those 311, and a horrific case of ignoring a severe AE by deeming it a protocol deviation! They all need to be called to testify in the #Phraud of the Century
I am not a fan of double blinding when the outcome is a 1 or a 0. Did the recipient develop COVID or not? It's pretty hard to fake symptoms. IF you really want an unbiased study then have all inoculants coded and analysis conducted by an unknown third party organization.
I am not a fan of double blinding when the outcome is a 1 or a 0. Did the recipient develop COVID or not? It's pretty hard to fake symptoms. IF you really want an unbiased study then have all inoculants coded and analysis conducted by an unknown third party organization.
Once again, we know who Pfizer are. But what about those in FDA and CDC who approved the protocol and approved emergency use of vaccine based on these practically criminal protocols? They get their salaries from US Government, not from sales!
Given the media suppression, the denialism within the majority public, I'm starting to think that even if we carrier pigeons, semaphore or Morse coded this info to everyone, they would still be pushing everyone to be innocculated.
Is it me or have we transitioned to living in the movie "Idiocracy"?!🤔🤨😐🤦♀️
Unbelievable! Interesting article.
I've had an initial look at the Pfizer data as well.
https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/pfizers-latest-data-release
When do the trials begin, or should we just go and get a rope already?
The factcheckers are no doubt all over this - oh wait.
Important to know! Thanks for this expose`.
The "math/stats" of the Protocol Violations table actually works out worse than reported though (you went easy on Pfizer). Good tests for rare events are Poisson and Exact Binomials.
Because the sample sizes were essentially identical (21,825 +/- 3), you can get a quick view of the probability of obtaining the other sample based on the parameters of the first, using the Poisson distribution.
The probability of observing 61 or less successes in an interval of ~22,000 people -- when the Poisson mean is 311 successes (per ~22,000) -- is tiny:
2.4 * 10^-67
It is much, much less likely than even 1 in 999 trillion.
The binominal probability of 61 or less out of 21828, using the probability of (311/21,823=) 0.014251 -- is even lower still:
5.3 * 10^-68
They could have wrapped some colored tape around the vials so that no one could see inside to know what they got. It would have been an easy fix. Thanks for reporting on this Josh.
Excellent. Open Edward Dowd link to his twitter and scroll down thru tweets. Their is and excellent Zoom link to watch and listen to Dr. Peirre Kory, Dr Jessica Rose, Edward Dowd, the lead systems analist from the PANDA group out of S. Africa, a GP Dr. from Ireland, and the host. 1 hr 38 minutes. Excellent. Thanks Josh.
From the article: <<Why does that matter? Recall that there was a much higher rate of “protocol deviations” among the placebo group than the treatment group (331 in treatment vs. 61 in placebo):>>
Don't you mean a much lower rate of deviations among the placebo group?
Great article, but please fix this - it's an important point and is confusing.
Thanks for that research!
Fortunately, the vaccine was only given to a couple of billion folks.
Fraud: deception or misrepresentation to gain an advantage: many of us who have resisted the propaganda from the outset, believe that other dodgy arrangements will eventually. come to light: unusual PPE contracts awarded, vested interests, cronyism,suppression of inconveniently challenging findings: the lab leak saga comes to mind.
https://www.mizzima.com/article/lawyers-expose-alleged-covid-19-fraud-and-vaccine-danger
Can't prove it, but knew there was fraud from the get-go. Billions at stake, a psychopathic corporation, a rushed trial, claims of too high efficacy. Important context is the fact that this fraud is the norm in vax trials. Real world data that is covered up anyhow, shows failures with pertussis, measles, chickenpox, mumps, and flu vaccines. And not only. Double blinded vax trials with inert placebo, independent of Big Pharma and Pharma interference (which means captured health agencies and they are all captured), are not done. Ever. They can't be. Only way is independent university, research institute trials. Key word there being independent, that is of both Pharma funding (direct, indirect), and a vax zealotry. So forget about it.
More than a study, it looks like a whore house to me.
Tracking down and documenting the 311 vaccine arm withdraws is a small sample set of potentially significant importance. 6x the rate of the placebo arm? Really? The Augusto Roux story out of the sketchy site 1231/4444 in Buenos Aires is just one of those 311, and a horrific case of ignoring a severe AE by deeming it a protocol deviation! They all need to be called to testify in the #Phraud of the Century
I am not a fan of double blinding when the outcome is a 1 or a 0. Did the recipient develop COVID or not? It's pretty hard to fake symptoms. IF you really want an unbiased study then have all inoculants coded and analysis conducted by an unknown third party organization.
I am not a fan of double blinding when the outcome is a 1 or a 0. Did the recipient develop COVID or not? It's pretty hard to fake symptoms. IF you really want an unbiased study then have all inoculants coded and analysis conducted by an unknown third party organization.
Once again, we know who Pfizer are. But what about those in FDA and CDC who approved the protocol and approved emergency use of vaccine based on these practically criminal protocols? They get their salaries from US Government, not from sales!